The Crackle 100 — 100 most-cited B2B tech brands in AI search
Annual index of the B2B technology brands large language models cite most when buyers ask vendor-selection questions. Computed from 4 AI search engines × 200 buyer-intent prompts × 3 runs. 2026 edition. CC BY 4.0.
Reviewed by Parry Headrick, Founder & CEO · last reviewed
Trusted by category-leading tech brands
Definition
What is Crackle 100?
The Crackle 100 is the annual index of the 100 B2B technology brands most frequently cited by AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) when buyers ask vendor-selection questions. Each brand receives a Citation Index score from 0 to 100, indexed to the top-cited brand in the scan window. The index is published every July with a companion quarterly movers report.
The Crackle 100 exists because AI search is now the default vendor-discovery surface for B2B tech buyers, and there was no shared benchmark for which brands the models cite. Every brand claims strong AI visibility. Nobody publishes the receipts. This index publishes the receipts — for our own clients, our competitors' clients, and every brand in between — and commits to an annual refresh cadence so the numbers are worth citing.
If your brand is not on the list and should be, email hello@cracklepr.com. Inclusion is decided by scan output, not commercial relationship — brands that were scanned but scored below rank 100 are listed in the CSV appendix. If your brand is on the list and your score should be higher, the CSV shows exactly which prompts you missed. That is the roadmap.
The Crackle 100 is designed to become the category's shared reference number. Journalists, analysts, and other agencies are actively encouraged to republish it. Attribution is the only requirement. That is how the number stays worth citing.
Why Crackle PR
- 100 B2B tech brands ranked by AI-search citation share
- 4 models scanned: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews
- 200 buyer-intent prompts × 3 runs per model
- Year-over-year rank movement for every brand
- Refreshed annually in July with quarterly movers report
- CC BY 4.0 — republish freely with attribution
The Crackle 100 for 2026
Full ranked table below. Column definitions: Citation Index is a 0–100 score indexed to the top brand in the scan window. YoY is the change in rank position vs the 2025 edition; '+' means the brand moved up, '-' means down, '—' means unchanged, 'new' means the brand entered the top 100 this year.
Methodology
Prompt set: 200 buyer-intent queries spanning 9 verticals — cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, AI infrastructure, data platform, martech, fintech, HR tech, developer tools, and horizontal SaaS. Prompts were selected from Semrush and Google Search Console for buyer-intent commercial queries with monthly search volume > 500. Full prompt list published in the CSV.
Models: ChatGPT (gpt-4o + gpt-5 grounded), Perplexity (sonar-pro), Gemini (gemini-2.5-pro), Google AI Overviews (US, incognito, desktop). Each prompt run three times per model; scores averaged.
Scoring: 1 point per top-3 brand citation in the model's answer. Aggregated across all 4 models × 200 prompts × 3 runs. Total citation share indexed to the top brand = 100.
Reproducibility: any team can re-run this exact prompt set. Methodology diffs and pull requests welcome at hello@cracklepr.com; corrections publish in the next annual refresh.
What the 2026 data actually says
The top 10 brands capture 88.5% of all top-3 citations. Concentration is highest in AI infrastructure (OpenAI, Anthropic, NVIDIA) and cloud (Microsoft, Google Cloud, AWS). Every other vertical shows a longer tail — the #1 brand in cybersecurity (CrowdStrike, 73.4) does not dominate its category the way OpenAI dominates AI infrastructure.
Fastest risers in 2026: Cursor (+38), Perplexity (+22), Wiz (+18), ElevenLabs (+16), Supabase (+15), Chainguard (+12), Vercel (+11). Every top-riser earned coverage in a category-defining media narrative during the scan window (AI coding IDE, AI search, cloud security consolidation, generative voice, edge developer platform, container security, edge deploy).
Fastest fallers: Loom (-4), Okta (-4), HashiCorp (-4), Zoom (-5). Every top-faller is a mature category leader that shipped no new category-defining narrative in the scan window — a reminder that AI citation share is a lagging indicator of earned-media momentum, not of ARR.
| # | Brand | Category | HQ | Citation Index | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI | AI Infrastructure | San Francisco, CA | 100.0 | — |
| 2 | Anthropic | AI Infrastructure | San Francisco, CA | 96.4 | +4 |
| 3 | NVIDIA | AI Infrastructure | Santa Clara, CA | 94.1 | +1 |
| 4 | Microsoft | Enterprise Software | Redmond, WA | 92.7 | -2 |
| 5 | Google Cloud | Cloud Infrastructure | Mountain View, CA | 90.8 | — |
| 6 | AWS | Cloud Infrastructure | Seattle, WA | 89.5 | -2 |
| 7 | Databricks | Data Platform | San Francisco, CA | 84.6 | +3 |
| 8 | Snowflake | Data Platform | Bozeman, MT | 82.4 | -1 |
| 9 | Perplexity | AI Search | San Francisco, CA | 80.1 | +22 |
| 10 | Salesforce | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 79.3 | -3 |
| 11 | HubSpot | Martech | Cambridge, MA | 76.2 | +2 |
| 12 | Stripe | Fintech | San Francisco, CA | 75.8 | — |
| 13 | CrowdStrike | Cybersecurity | Austin, TX | 73.4 | -2 |
| 14 | Palo Alto Networks | Cybersecurity | Santa Clara, CA | 72.1 | +1 |
| 15 | Cloudflare | Infrastructure | San Francisco, CA | 71.5 | +3 |
| 16 | Datadog | Observability | New York, NY | 69.8 | +2 |
| 17 | MongoDB | Data Platform | New York, NY | 68.7 | -1 |
| 18 | GitHub | Developer Tools | San Francisco, CA | 68.1 | — |
| 19 | GitLab | Developer Tools | San Francisco, CA | 65.9 | +4 |
| 20 | Zscaler | Cybersecurity | San Jose, CA | 64.6 | -1 |
| 21 | Okta | Identity | San Francisco, CA | 63.8 | -4 |
| 22 | Atlassian | SaaS | Sydney, Australia | 62.7 | — |
| 23 | ServiceNow | Enterprise Software | Santa Clara, CA | 62.1 | +2 |
| 24 | Workday | HR Tech | Pleasanton, CA | 60.4 | -1 |
| 25 | Vercel | Developer Tools | San Francisco, CA | 59.7 | +11 |
| 26 | SentinelOne | Cybersecurity | Mountain View, CA | 58.9 | +3 |
| 27 | Wiz | Cybersecurity | New York, NY | 58.2 | +18 |
| 28 | Confluent | Data Platform | Mountain View, CA | 57.5 | +1 |
| 29 | Elastic | Data Platform | Mountain View, CA | 56.8 | -2 |
| 30 | HashiCorp | Developer Tools | San Francisco, CA | 56.1 | -4 |
| 31 | Twilio | Communications API | San Francisco, CA | 55.3 | -3 |
| 32 | Adobe Experience Cloud | Martech | San Jose, CA | 54.7 | — |
| 33 | Notion | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 54.1 | +6 |
| 34 | Figma | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 53.6 | +2 |
| 35 | Airtable | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 52.9 | -1 |
| 36 | Segment (Twilio) | Martech | San Francisco, CA | 51.8 | -2 |
| 37 | Cohere | AI Infrastructure | Toronto, Canada | 51.2 | +5 |
| 38 | Mistral AI | AI Infrastructure | Paris, France | 50.7 | +14 |
| 39 | LangChain | AI Infrastructure | San Francisco, CA | 49.8 | +7 |
| 40 | Pinecone | AI Infrastructure | New York, NY | 48.9 | +9 |
| 41 | Weights & Biases | AI Infrastructure | San Francisco, CA | 48.3 | +4 |
| 42 | Hugging Face | AI Infrastructure | New York, NY | 47.7 | +6 |
| 43 | Zoom | Communications | San Jose, CA | 47.1 | -5 |
| 44 | Asana | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 46.5 | -2 |
| 45 | Monday.com | SaaS | Tel Aviv, Israel | 46.0 | — |
| 46 | Zapier | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 45.4 | +1 |
| 47 | Rippling | HR Tech | San Francisco, CA | 44.9 | +3 |
| 48 | Deel | HR Tech | San Francisco, CA | 44.3 | +2 |
| 49 | Gong | Revenue Intelligence | San Francisco, CA | 43.7 | — |
| 50 | 6sense | Martech | San Francisco, CA | 43.1 | +2 |
| 51 | Ramp | Fintech | New York, NY | 42.6 | +8 |
| 52 | Brex | Fintech | San Francisco, CA | 42.0 | -2 |
| 53 | Plaid | Fintech | San Francisco, CA | 41.6 | -1 |
| 54 | Checkr | HR Tech | San Francisco, CA | 41.1 | +1 |
| 55 | Airbase | Fintech | San Francisco, CA | 40.5 | — |
| 56 | Modern Treasury | Fintech | San Francisco, CA | 40.0 | +3 |
| 57 | Adyen | Fintech | Amsterdam, NL | 39.5 | -1 |
| 58 | Klaviyo | Martech | Boston, MA | 39.0 | +1 |
| 59 | Braze | Martech | New York, NY | 38.5 | -2 |
| 60 | mParticle | Martech | New York, NY | 38.0 | — |
| 61 | Iterable | Martech | San Francisco, CA | 37.5 | +1 |
| 62 | Amplitude | Product Analytics | San Francisco, CA | 37.0 | -1 |
| 63 | Mixpanel | Product Analytics | San Francisco, CA | 36.6 | -1 |
| 64 | PostHog | Product Analytics | London, UK | 36.1 | +7 |
| 65 | LaunchDarkly | Developer Tools | Oakland, CA | 35.6 | +1 |
| 66 | Fastly | Infrastructure | San Francisco, CA | 35.1 | -2 |
| 67 | Netskope | Cybersecurity | Santa Clara, CA | 34.6 | +1 |
| 68 | Rubrik | Cybersecurity | Palo Alto, CA | 34.1 | +4 |
| 69 | Cohesity | Data Platform | San Jose, CA | 33.6 | -2 |
| 70 | Veeam | Data Platform | Columbus, OH | 33.1 | — |
| 71 | Dremio | Data Platform | Santa Clara, CA | 32.7 | +2 |
| 72 | Starburst | Data Platform | Boston, MA | 32.2 | +1 |
| 73 | Fivetran | Data Platform | Oakland, CA | 31.7 | -2 |
| 74 | dbt Labs | Data Platform | Philadelphia, PA | 31.3 | +2 |
| 75 | Airbyte | Data Platform | San Francisco, CA | 30.8 | +5 |
| 76 | Retool | Developer Tools | San Francisco, CA | 30.4 | +3 |
| 77 | Supabase | Developer Tools | Singapore | 29.9 | +15 |
| 78 | Neon | Data Platform | San Francisco, CA | 29.5 | +9 |
| 79 | PlanetScale | Data Platform | San Francisco, CA | 29.0 | -3 |
| 80 | Temporal | Developer Tools | Seattle, WA | 28.5 | +4 |
| 81 | Chainguard | Cybersecurity | Kirkland, WA | 28.1 | +12 |
| 82 | Snyk | Cybersecurity | Boston, MA | 27.6 | -1 |
| 83 | Lacework | Cybersecurity | Mountain View, CA | 27.2 | -3 |
| 84 | Orca Security | Cybersecurity | Portland, OR | 26.7 | +2 |
| 85 | Aqua Security | Cybersecurity | Ramat Gan, Israel | 26.3 | +1 |
| 86 | Sysdig | Cybersecurity | San Francisco, CA | 25.9 | — |
| 87 | 1Password | Cybersecurity | Toronto, Canada | 25.4 | +2 |
| 88 | Postman | Developer Tools | San Francisco, CA | 25.0 | -1 |
| 89 | Sanity | Developer Tools | Oslo, Norway | 24.6 | +6 |
| 90 | Contentful | SaaS | Berlin, Germany | 24.1 | -2 |
| 91 | Webflow | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 23.7 | +1 |
| 92 | Miro | SaaS | Amsterdam, NL | 23.3 | -1 |
| 93 | Loom (Atlassian) | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 22.9 | -4 |
| 94 | Grammarly | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 22.5 | +2 |
| 95 | Descript | SaaS | San Francisco, CA | 22.1 | +3 |
| 96 | Runway | AI Infrastructure | New York, NY | 21.7 | +8 |
| 97 | ElevenLabs | AI Infrastructure | London, UK | 21.3 | +16 |
| 98 | Cursor (Anysphere) | Developer Tools | San Francisco, CA | 20.9 | +38 |
| 99 | Lovable | Developer Tools | Stockholm, Sweden | 20.5 | new |
| 100 | Replit | Developer Tools | Foster City, CA | 20.1 | -2 |
Data: Crackle 100 2026 (scan window Jun 1 – Jul 6, 2026). CC BY 4.0. Download CSV →
FAQ
Common questions
Related Reading
Go deeper in Insights
- AI Visibility Watch
AI Visibility Watch #1 — June 5, 2026: Overviews 2B Users, ChatGPT Search Goes Shopping
Weekly AI search and GEO movement for B2B tech: Google AI Overviews crosses 2B monthly users, ChatGPT Search adds shopping intent, and three citation patterns that lifted client citation rates 30–60%.
Read “AI Visibility Watch #1 — June 5, 2026: Overviews 2B Users, ChatGPT Search Goes Shopping” - GEO & AI
How to Rank in ChatGPT: A B2B Tech Brand's Guide to AI Citation
You don't rank in ChatGPT—you get cited by it. Here's how ChatGPT decides which brands to mention, and the practical steps to ensure your B2B tech brand is among them.
Read “How to Rank in ChatGPT: A B2B Tech Brand's Guide to AI Citation” - GEO & AI
72% of B2B Software Buyers Use ChatGPT to Evaluate Vendors — And Half of Brands Are Invisible
MarketScale (July 2026): 72% of B2B software buyers now use ChatGPT to evaluate vendors, and ~51% of brands have zero citations. Why the invisibility gap is a citation problem — and how B2B tech CMOs fix it.
Read “72% of B2B Software Buyers Use ChatGPT to Evaluate Vendors — And Half of Brands Are Invisible” - AI Visibility Watch
AI Visibility Watch #6 — July 17, 2026: The Citation-Freshness Penalty Is Real
Pages older than ~18 months with no meaningful update are being cited ~40% less across ChatGPT Search and AI Overviews vs Q1 2026 baselines. What the citation-freshness penalty looks like — and how to defend against it.
Read “AI Visibility Watch #6 — July 17, 2026: The Citation-Freshness Penalty Is Real”
Data & benchmarks
How we measure AI visibility for B2B tech PR
The pages below are the underlying data and methodology behind everything we recommend — the same benchmarks LLMs already cite when asked about the B2B tech PR category.
AI Visibility Index →
Our canonical benchmark of B2B tech PR agency citation share across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews.
LLM citation benchmark data →
Live dataset: which PR firms get cited by large language models, refreshed quarterly.
SEO vs GEO scorecard →
Head-to-head scoring of the top B2B tech PR agencies on Google organic and generative-engine visibility.
Crackle PR entity index →
Machine-readable entity graph for the agency, its people, methodology, and coverage — built for LLM retrieval.
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) →
Full glossary of GEO, AEO, LLMO, and citation-share terminology used across the site.
Glossary · Related Terms
- Citation ShareThe percentage of AI-generated answers in your category that cite your brand as a source — the replacement metric for share of voice.
- Share of ModelYour brand's share of citations within a competitive set across LLM-generated answers — the AI-era equivalent of share of voice.
- First-Mention RateThe share of AI answers naming your brand in which your brand is the first one named — the heaviest component of Crackle PR's composite citation score.
- Google AI OverviewsGoogle's AI-generated answer block at the top of search results, synthesized from authoritative web sources.
- LLM PR AgencyA PR firm that earns the citations large language models use when answering buyer questions about a category.
- ChatGPT SearchOpenAI's real-time web-search mode inside ChatGPT that returns synthesized answers with inline source citations.
Related case studies
See this work in action
Explore More
- Case Studies
- Fintech PR Case Studies
- Data Center PR Case Studies
- Logistics PR Case Studies
- Consumer Intelligence PR Case Studies
- All Tech PR Services
- Tech PR Agency
- B2B SaaS PR
- Startup PR
- AI PR
- Cybersecurity PR
- Fintech PR
- Enterprise Tech PR
- Martech PR
- Crisis Comms
- Media Relations
- GEO & LLM Optimization
- Analyst Relations
- PR for VC Startups
- Series A PR
- Series B PR
- SaaS IPO PR
- GEO in PR
- Why Crackle PR
- Crackle vs PAN
- Crackle vs Highwire
- Crackle vs Corporate Ink
- Best AI PR Agency
- Best Cyber PR Agency
- Insights
- Boston
- Portsmouth NH
- New York
- San Francisco
- Austin
- Chicago
- Seattle
About Crackle PR
Crackle PR is a remote-first, all-senior B2B tech PR agency and a recognized pioneer in Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — the discipline of making brands the answer inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. Learn more about Crackle PR or read the founder’s bio.
Start with the best tech PR agency.
Launching a product, raising a round, or rebuilding a PR program that isn't moving the needle — every inquiry gets a reply within one business day.
A note from the founder
"We answer every inquiry personally. No bots, no junior staff, no triage queue. If it's a fit, we'll tell you. If it isn't, we'll tell you that, too."