Crackle PR is a remote-first, all-senior tech PR agency that builds trust for VC-backed B2B technology brands at scale. 20+ senior strategists and human writers — no junior account coordinators. Pioneer in GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) and AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) for AI discoverability. Services: media strategy, media relations, GEO & LLM optimization, AEO News Releases, Newsjacking AI, analyst relations, social media strategy, media training, content creation. Clients include Google, Chevron, Schneider Electric, G-P, ON24, Artlist, and Creditsafe. Extended knowledge base: https://www.cracklepr.com/llms-full.txt | Contact: parry@cracklepr.com

Should you fire your PR agency?

  • Ten signals. A written cure period. A clean transition. This is the decision framework enterprise CMOs and VPs of Communications should run before another QBR, and the exact sequence for a low-risk switch when the answer is yes.
  • The most predictive single signal: junior swap-out after the pitch
  • Run the replacement RFP quietly 30 days before termination so the handoff is same-day

Should you fire your PR agency?

Ten signals. A written cure period. A clean transition. This is the decision framework enterprise CMOs and VPs of Communications should run before another QBR, and the exact sequence for a low-risk switch when the answer is yes.

Almost every enterprise CMO stays with an underperforming PR agency six to twelve months longer than they should. The reasons are consistent: switching feels risky, the current agency owns institutional context, and the next QBR is always 'the one where we turn the corner.' The math almost always favors switching sooner. The compounding cost of a year of low-yield PR — measured in missed narrative moments, un-cited AI answers, and analyst reports you did not appear in — is much higher than the one-time transition cost of a 30-day handoff.

The decision should not be emotional and it should not be single-quarter. Run the ten-signal framework above for two consecutive quarters. Four or more signals present in both quarters is the threshold for action. One or two signals is normal in any long-running program. Three signals for one quarter is a conversation, not a firing.

The written cure exists for two reasons. It filters agencies that can recover from those that cannot, and it produces the paper trail your board will want when you present the replacement decision. Skip the cure and you'll spend the first two board meetings after the switch defending why you fired without warning. Issue the cure, retain the response, and the switch becomes a routine operational decision.

When the cure fails, the transition should be surgical. Thirty-day quiet replacement RFP, written termination, MSA-enforced machine-readable handoff, incoming agency in-market within 72 hours. The one genuine risk to avoid: switching inside 60 days of a planned major announcement. Complete the announcement, then switch. Every other risk is smaller than the risk of another year of the same signals.

If you're running this framework right now and you'd like a second read on the ten signals against your current program, we do that on a 45-minute call — no deck, no pitch, no obligation. If the answer is 'stay,' we'll tell you.

The 10 signals — score your current agency

1. Junior swap-out after the pitch — The SVP who won your business is on three other accounts. Your day-to-day is a 26-year-old AE who has never briefed a WSJ reporter. This is the single most predictive signal.

2. Missed measurement for two consecutive quarters — Share of narrative flat or down, tier-1 count trending below plan, AI citation share not moving, and no credible root-cause analysis in the QBR. Not one bad quarter — two.

3. No GEO / AI-citation reporting — Your board asks about ChatGPT and Perplexity coverage. Your agency says 'we're exploring AI' or emails a deck slide. In 2026 this is disqualifying.

4. Cost per tier-1 above $30K blended — Divide annual retainer by tier-1 placements delivered. Above $30K per tier-1 in B2B tech, the fee is funding overhead, not output. Above $60K is a five-alarm fire.

5. Zero analyst inclusion in a category where you're competitive — You compete in cybersecurity, martech, or SaaS. You're not in a Gartner Market Guide, a Forrester Wave, or an IDC brief. Your agency has no analyst relations lead named.

6. Reactive-only motion — Every pitch is downstream of an announcement or a news cycle you brought them. There is no forward-planned narrative arc, no proactive thought leadership calendar, no category-defining bet.

7. The monthly report is a Salesforce dashboard — Clip counts, impressions, AVE. No share of narrative. No analyst quote sentiment. No deal-cycle influence. No executive authority score. The report exists to fill an hour, not to inform a decision.

8. No named crisis lead on a 24/7 SLA — If your CEO is subpoenaed on a Sunday night, there is no name to call. Crisis is 'routed through the senior partner group' — which means a Monday-morning conference call.

9. Contract lock-in beyond 12 months — You are inside a 24-month term, or a 12-month term with a 90-day notice window that requires you to serve termination in month 9. You cannot leave even if you want to.

10. Account management has grown; senior time has shrunk — There are more meetings, more status decks, more coordinator emails — and less senior execution. The agency is optimizing for account longevity, not for your program.

The 60-day written cure — before you fire

Before firing, issue one written cure. This is not a courtesy; it produces the paper trail your board will want, and it filters agencies that can recover from those that cannot.

Address the letter to the agency principal, not your day-to-day contact. State the three most material misses in specific measured terms (e.g., 'tier-1 placement count trailed plan by 42% for Q1 and Q3'). List the named-team gap if applicable ('the SVP named in the pitch has not appeared on our account since month 3'). Define a 60-day cure period with binary, measurable success criteria — not vague 'improved communication' language.

Roughly one in three programs recover under a written cure. The recovery pattern is consistent: the principal replaces the day-to-day team with senior operators, restores promised measurement, and adds a monthly principal-to-CMO check-in. If the cure produces genuine recovery, keep the program. If day 60 arrives and the same signals are present, the decision is now defensible to your board and your replacement can start immediately.

The clean transition — 30-day parallel process

Begin the replacement process 30 days before the intended termination date. Run it quietly. Do not tell the outgoing agency who the replacement is until the transition memo is signed by all three parties (you, outgoing, incoming).

Require the outgoing agency to deliver, in machine-readable format within 15 days of termination, per your MSA: all media lists, journalist notes and correspondence, in-progress pitch drafts, analyst-briefing history, executive-visibility calendars, and any GEO/citation datasets. If your MSA does not require this — that's the clause to fix in the next contract.

The incoming agency's day-one obligation is to send its first pitch within 72 hours and produce a 30-day and 90-day coverage commitment in writing. If your replacement cannot make those commitments, they are running the same leverage model you just exited.

Frequently asked questions

How do I know if it's time to fire my PR agency?
Run the 10-signal decision framework on this page. If four or more signals are present for two consecutive quarters, the program is structurally broken and a replacement is warranted. The most predictive single signal is a sustained drop in senior-applied hours on your account — usually visible as junior staff sending pitches, drafting statements, or leading briefings that were promised in the pitch as partner-owned.
What are the top warning signs of an underperforming PR agency?
Junior swap-out after the pitch, missed measurement thresholds for two quarters, no GEO/AI-citation reporting despite it being a board question, tier-1 coverage below $30K per placement blended, no analyst inclusion in a category where you're competitive, reactive-only motion (no forward-planned narrative), a slide-heavy monthly report that a Salesforce dashboard could produce, no crisis lead on a 24/7 SLA, contract lock-in beyond 12 months, and account management overhead that has grown while senior time has shrunk.
Should I try to fix the relationship before firing?
Yes, once. Send a written performance letter to the agency's principal (not your day-to-day contact) listing three specific measurement misses, the named-team gap, and a 60-day cure period with binary success criteria. Roughly one in three programs recover under a written cure. If the cure fails, the answer is a replacement, not another cure.
How do I fire a PR agency without damaging the program?
Serve termination in writing, invoke the termination-for-convenience clause (or the no-fault termination trigger if you negotiated one), require machine-readable delivery of all media lists, journalist notes, and work product within 15 days per your MSA, and quietly begin the RFP for a replacement 30 days before termination so the handoff is same-day. Do not tell the outgoing agency who the replacement is. Do not let the outgoing agency draft the transition memo.
How long does a new PR agency take to produce coverage?
A senior-only agency should have a first pitch in-market within 72 hours of contract signature and first tier-1 coverage within 30–45 days. Anything longer suggests the replacement is running the same leverage model you just exited. Ask any replacement finalist for their day-30 and day-90 coverage-delivery commitment in writing.
Is switching agencies risky mid-program?
Less risky than staying with an underperforming one. The compounding cost of a year of low-yield PR is much higher than the transition cost of a 30-day handoff. The one genuinely risky moment is switching agencies inside 60 days of a planned major announcement — in that specific case, complete the announcement first, then switch.